Al Gore on The Issues

Al Gore on The Issues: While speculation about a possible Al Gore 2008 run continues, he has uploaded three short videos on Current.com giving his views on three of the major issues of the day. Vice President Gore discusses health care in "Health care is a right", civil rights and the excesses of the Executive Branch in "Americans deserve more protection" and the Iraq war in "Get the troops home".


Check this out

Hey All Wanting a Better World,

Check out this guy who has the answers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxW8D_iuBUA

Alternatively, go to
"trickertricks"
on Youtube and watch this video:

'The Problem With the Environmentalists.'

Peace.


bush, clinton, bush, clinton... bush

Please no... don't let it happen


Our Declaration of Independence Revisited - Draft Al Gore!!

mainstreetUSA

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present GEORGE W. BUSH is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

GEORGE W. BUSH has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
GEORGE W. BUSH has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
GEORGE W. BUSH has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
GEORGE W. BUSH has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
GEORGE W. BUSH has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
GEORGE W. BUSH has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
GEORGE W. BUSH has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
GEORGE W. BUSH has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
GEORGE W. BUSH has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
GEORGE W. BUSH has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
GEORGE W. BUSH has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
GEORGE W. BUSH is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries (BLACKWATER) to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
GEORGE W. BUSH has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
GEORGE W. BUSH has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

WE NEED AL GORE!!


When This Whole Mess the Human Race is in Began

Hi Everybody,

Check out this Controversial figure on Youtube:

"trickertricks"

has posted a sequence of videos titled:

'When This Whole Mess the Human Race is in Began part 1, 2, 3 and 4.'

Check it out!


Clinton's new primary color: $35 million in green - REALITY

updated 3 hours, 36 minutes ago Clinton's new primary color: $35 million in greenStory Highlights
Sen. Hillary Clinton tops Sen. Barack Obama in primary campaign fundraising

GOP cash leader, Rudy Giuliani, reports $11.6 million for the primaries

Romney leads GOP spending for the year with $52.8 million

McCain's red financial condition may force him to accept public financing
Next Article in Politics »

Read CHART

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton has pulled ahead of rival Barack Obama at the bank as well as in the polls and both continue to crush Republicans in the money race.

New York Sen. Hillary Clinton edged past Democratic rival Sen. Barack Obama in third-quarter fundraising.

Clinton holds nearly $35 million three months before the voting starts, to Obama's $32 million.

The Republican money leader, Rudy Giuliani, reported $11.6 million in the bank for the primaries.

Clinton, who had trailed Obama in fundraising and in money in the bank at the end of June, edged past him with an aggressive third quarter of fundraising.

The New York senator, who also has been raising money for the general election, had a total of $50.5 million in the bank, her campaign reported. But nearly $16 million of that cannot be used for the primaries. Watch how Clinton is campaigning directly to women

She reported raising $23.7 million for the primary and had operating expenses of $21.3 million. Obama spent a nearly identical amount, but he raised $19.3 million in the quarter. They each reported debts -- Clinton owed $2.3 million and Obama owed $1.4 million.

Don't Miss
Political TV spending to hit $3 billion
Edwards questions Clinton's sincerity
Thompson takes shot at Giuliani for liberal views
Election Center 2008 Candidates
Democrat John Edwards reported $12.4 million in the bank after raising nearly $7.2 million and spending almost $8.3 million during the quarter. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, trying to establish himself among the Democratic leaders, reported $5.8 million in the bank. He raised $5.3 million in the quarter and spent $6.6 million.

Among Republicans, Mitt Romney spent $21 million during the third quarter, more than twice what he raised during the period and more than what he spent in previous quarters, according to his FEC report.

John McCain, enjoying something of a resurgence in the polls after a dismal second quarter, reported more than $1.6 million cash on hand for the primaries and more than $1.7 million in debts, putting his campaign in the red. McCain has an extra $1.8 million in the bank that can only be used if he wins the Republican nomination.

McCain's financial condition may force him to accept public financing for his campaign, providing an infusion of cash but limiting how much he can spend. McCain's report detailed how his primary spending has been allocated by state, an indication that he is prepared to accept matching federal money.

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor and venture capitalist, has been tapping his personal wealth to supplement money from contributors. He raised $9.8 million and lent his campaign $8.5 million over the summer. Watch Romney define his GOP status

Giuliani reported spending $13 million during the same period, compared to the $10.2 million he raised for the primary campaign. Giuliani also raised about $1.3 million to spend on the general election if he wins the nomination.

Fred Thompson, who didn't officially enter the race until early September, reported spending $5.4 million during the quarter, more than half of it last month.

Thompson, whose report covers fundraising and spending since June, when he began exploring a presidential bid, raised $12.8 million during that four month-period. He reported $7.1 million in the bank at the end of September, as well as $678,000 in debts.

Romney reported $9.2 million cash in hand, thanks in large part to the $17.5 million he has funneled into his campaign since the beginning of the year. He has raised $45 million since January, but leads all Republican candidates with $52.8 million in spending for the year.

In the Republican surprise of the quarter, long-shot candidate Ron Paul capitalized on his anti-war stance and Internet following to amass $5.2 million in contributions. He reported $5.4 million cash on hand at the end of September.

As a group Romney, Giuliani and Thompson enter the final stretch before the first nominating contests with money to spend on get-out-the-vote and advertising campaigns. See how campaign ad spending is projected to reach record highs »

Giuliani led the Republican field in fundraising this summer, according to early estimates provided by the campaigns, though his July-September total fell from his high during April-June. It was the first time Giuliani's campaign spent more than it raised during a quarter.

Thompson, the former Tennessee senator and actor on NBC's "Law & Order," raised $9.3 million of his $12.8 million total during July-September.

Among Democrats, Clinton used the third quarter to secure her place as a national front-runner. She has recently hit 50-percent support among Democrats in national polls, though the race is closer in Iowa, where she holds a small lead in a cluster with Obama and Edwards.

Her biggest expenditure for the quarter was $4 million for salaries followed by $2.2 million for travel. Her advertising expenses, which are beginning to increase, were $1.7 million.

Clinton also refunded $1.2 million to donors, including more than $800,000 to donors linked to disgraced Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu.

Obama had a $3.8 million payroll for the quarter and spent $2.3 million on travel.

Giuliani is the Republican front-runner nationally, but he lags behind Romney in the leadoff caucus state of Iowa. In New Hampshire, another important early voting state, polls show the race a virtual toss-up among Giuliani, Romney and John McCain. Thompson also is competitive with the top tier in state and national polls.

According to Giuliani's report, the campaign spent more than $2 million on payroll and $1.3 million on travel from July-September, about as much as it had during the first six months of the year.

His campaign increased advertising this quarter, spending nearly $470,000 on radio and newspapers, including a full-page ad in The New York Times last month that criticized Clinton, the Democratic front-runner. Giuliani leads all candidates in radio advertising with more than 640 spots in several states, according to the Nielsen television ratings company.

Romney has spent much more on television, but radio is cheaper and can be targeted to specific audiences.

Romney spent nearly $6 million on television and radio commercials, bringing his total ad spending for the year to a whopping $12.7 million. So far, Romney has placed the most political ads on the air than any candidate, Democrat or Republican. The Nielsen Co., which also monitors advertising, reported Monday that Romney had placed 10,600 television ads from January 1 to October 10. Richardson, the Democrat, was second with 5,800 television spots.

Both candidates, little known outside their states or national political circles, have used their ads to increase their name recognition, particularly in Iowa, the state scheduled to hold the first-in-the-nation caucuses in early January.

Obama ramped up his advertising toward the end of third quarter, spending nearly $3.3 million on media. He has placed more than 4,200 spots on television, practically all of them in Iowa, according to Nielsen. Clinton has placed nearly 2,200 spots, with more than 1,600 airing in Iowa. According to Nielsen, Clinton also has placed a small number of ads in other states, including New York, Tennessee, Louisiana and Arizona. E-mail to a friend

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Hillary will be for DEMS what Bush are for Repugs.

I don’t really get your purpose WANBLIGI...
What’s your point? That “we” all should reconsider Hillary Clinton??
Let me inlight you about Her Hillaryness “I don’t answer that” Clinton.
1. She was elected US senator in 2000, after her opponent did a walk over because he had prostate cancer. (Well she was lucky I suppose..)
(MAJOR QESTION: Will she repeat her victory now, against a healthy Rudy Giuliani or should we all hope for cancer again...? )
2. She voted FOR the Iraqi war. Now she is against it.. before she will do it all over again..
3. She voted FOR a possible enlargement of the above said war. Now with Iran...
4. She wants to introduce a universal health care reform without saying how..
5. She is constantly dodging the “though ones” with an annoying cackle..
6. She wants to be PREZ so hard that she can almost taste it, but she doesn’t give a damn in you.. REALLY!
7. And the last time I checked the US wasn’t a monarchy..

So vote for her WANBIGLI but don’t be surprised if she doesn’t get elected.


Greed is not good.

Yankee Doodle's picture

The Politics of Money. American democracy is a complete a farce now. Whoever has the the most money wins. What a joke. Our system for electing a president is completely corrupt. Let's hope Al Gore will get in this thing and revolutionize our country. Hilary Clinton is a smart woman, but for so many reasons she will not be elected. The Democratic party would be really stupid to nominate her. There is zero passion for her candidacy. she has the money and the name that's all.


See this part?

scubaval's picture

"Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed."

Do you not understand what that means?

Make an educated comment, post a link. If it's worthy of response, you'll get one.

On the other hand, if you support another candidate, then what the heck are you doing here?


Yeah, so?

Rosemond's picture

Don't you have a conference call or something like that with the Clinton campaign you should be attending to?


Interesting That He's Posted This.......

Rosemond's picture

Why state positions on these things? Hmmm. Is he merely letting his base know where he is on the issues so we can select a candidate among those running; or is this a precursor to a run? I am hoping the latter.

We'll see. And soon. The deadline for the Michigan primary is coming up, and it will require his signature on affidavit. Time to put up or (at least for us), shut up.

And again, Hilary Clinton -- blech!


By the way....

The Michigan primary filing date of Oct 23 is not necessarily relevant, as its status is very questionable. Last I heard, Hillary was still signed up but Obama and Edwards had pulled out. The national party will likely not accept delegates chosen thereby anyway (all of this due to its overly early date, in deference to Iowa and NH). If that happens, the MI primary will probably be canceled and a caucus scheduled for later, or so says NPR. The next drop-dead date is November 1, filing deadline for the GA and SC primaries.

The whole primary/caucus system needs to be overhauled, but it would take a constitutional amendment, I think.


Yes, VERY Interesting Indeed!

Notice that the Current TV page of his uploads shows only these three items, all posted on Sunday. He is the chairman of the network, and this is the first time he has actually submitted content. This makes it appear particularly significant.

These are not posished pieces. He is dressed casually, he is speaking colloquially rather than speeechifying, It was clearly done from a webcam. What are we to make of this? That he felt for some reason that he needed to put something out on these issues NOW, even though he is on the record with all of them already?

It could be, Rosemond, as you speculate, that he wants to call these issues to our attention to advise us in what to look for among the declared candidates as we make up our minds who to support, because he is NOT running. But if that is so, it isn't the whole story, because these three issues -- the war in Iraq, the unraveling of the Constitution under the Bush regime, and the need for single payer universal health care -- are in every case positions which the "top three" either will not take (or have not so far). All are on the record as waffling on the war, proposing non-single-payer health policies, and are silent or nearly so on the rights of the individual in the face of creeping totalitarianism.

Conspicuously absent is a statement on global warming, but we already know where he stands. He is on the record as saying that the premier issue in the 2008 election WILL be global warming, this throwing down the gauntlet at the feet of the declared candidates with the implicit challenge that if no one else makes this so, then HE will. So far no one has done more than give lip service. Are these messages, perhaps, more raised bars he is daring the others to clear? And if they show as little political courage as they already have, why would he expect them to do so now? If it is a challenge, I think it is pro forma prior to entering the race.

So I think it is your second guess that is right: he is preparing to announce a run, and letting his supporters know it. Why else issue position statements in that way, informal though they are, unless in support of a candidacy?

These issues, plus gobal warming, will be the themes of his campaign. Though global warming will be "the premier issue" as he says, Al is no one trick pony. When I read "The Assault On Reason" it looked to me as nothing short of a manifesto on the very serious issue of rebuilding our democracy and healing it of the many wounds inflicted by the forces of neofascism over the last seven years. The war in Iraq is just the most extreme example of an insane foreign policy that urgently and thoroghly needs righting, while the health care crisis is our most pressing domestic issue that demands fundamental reform.

Al is smart enough to realize that politics as usual cannot move this mountain, that real leadership on the scale of a Lincoln or an FDR is required. I'm sure he is as discouraged as we are that none of the announced candidates, for varying reasons, can carry that off. I hope that he is realizing that only he can, and that therefore he must.


Great Analysis

Rosemond's picture

But I would caution anyone to think that if he runs, he can be anything but bare-knuckled and ruthless. He is not just a visionary, but smart. if he runs he will have to come out with all guns blazing at Hilary. Let's not let our idealism cloud the reality of what it willl take for Al to become President.

And the neat thing is, how can she hit back? Al's record is her husband's record (and to some extent, hers). She cannot both embrace it, and then attack it. To the extent they (she and her husband) attempt to rewrite history minimizing Gore's role, it will appear turncoat and desperate, and will play into everyone's vision of her -- a triangulator that will do/say anything to get elected..

And now you've got all the declared candidates praising Al's leadership. How do they attack him?

I firmly believe that if Al comes out swinging, he can sweep up the nomination. In fact, it could be an ass-kicking of monumental proportions. But he has to resort to the sort of politics that he does not like. At the very least, he has to have surrogates do it. Of course, i'd love to fill that role!


The Real Inconvienent Truth

While I love Al Gore and voted for him and would again, I think he should be more open and state what the real Inconvenient Truth is that is changing our climate. That would be BREEDING! We need to get a better control on the human population! Consider how many schools we build because there aren't enough and the pollution that went into every item --flooring, walls, cement, trucks to carry the cement and the diesel buses that bring the kids to school. Can't say biodiesel because that even is a big contributor to pollution in many forms. Breeding is at the root of all of climate changes and when we become NOT to politically correct to realize it and be open with it, then the changes will work.


Even More Inconvenient

You are not the first to bring this up. But for some strange reason, every time I do hear someone bring this up, they forget an even more inconvenient truth: 0 and <0 population growth introduces its own problems, problems societies and governments find even more unpleasant.

A recent issue of the Economist went into this in detail. One such article is:
http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=9539825


And what do you suggest?

scubaval's picture

Eugenics? Birth control for all? How about mandatory abortion? Or follow China's lead, and make it unlawful to have more than one child?

How about we figure out how to feed and house everybody? We don't know where the next Einstein, Mozart, Mandela, Ghandi or Gore will come from.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.